IBB Insights

EBIT vs EBITDA vs Net Income: What Each Measures and Which Multiple to Use

EBIT vs EBITDA vs net income for investment banking interviews: what each one leaves out, which valuation multiple it pairs with, and when EBITDA flatters.

· Kai · 7 min read · Technicals

EBIT vs EBITDA vs net income sounds like a vocabulary question, and most candidates answer it like one, with three definitions the interviewer knows by heart. The interviewer wants to hear who each number belongs to, which valuation multiple it pairs with, and when it makes a company look better than it is. Get those three points straight and you have the material for every follow-up below.

EBIT vs EBITDA vs net income, line by line

Picture the income statement as a staircase of deductions, with each measure a step where you stop.

  • EBITDA is the first step. The company has paid suppliers, staff and overheads, and nothing else. It is the closest the income statement gets to operating cash flow, which is why comps sheets lead with it.
  • EBIT subtracts depreciation and amortisation from EBITDA. It charges the business for wearing out its assets but still sits before interest and tax. It is also the starting point for NOPAT and for unlevered free cash flow in a DCF.
  • Net income keeps going: interest, tax, non-operating gains and losses, and everything else below the line. The remainder belongs to shareholders alone.

The sentence to say out loud: "EBITDA and EBIT measure profit before the company pays the people who fund it. Net income is what is left for shareholders after lenders and the tax authority have been paid."

Take care when you lift EBITDA from a press release, because it is a non-GAAP figure. SEC staff guidance says a company presenting it as a performance measure should reconcile it to net income, and that anything calculated differently needs a distinct label such as "Adjusted EBITDA" (SEC non-GAAP interpretations, Questions 103.01 and 103.02). Read the reconciliation and its add-backs before a number goes into your comps.

Match each multiple to whoever owns the earnings

Ask one question of any earnings figure: has interest been paid yet?

  • Before interest (EBITDA, EBIT): use enterprise value. Enterprise value is the whole business, owed to lenders and shareholders together. EBITDA and EBIT are available to both groups as well, so EV/EBITDA and EV/EBIT match.
  • After interest (net income): use equity value. P/E is equity value over net income, or share price over earnings per share. Both sides belong to shareholders only.

An illustrative example with round numbers shows why. Two companies run identical businesses: EBITDA of 100, EBIT of 80, a 25% tax rate and an enterprise value of 800. Company A has no debt. Company B has 400 of debt at 5%. Neither holds cash.

Same business, two balance sheetsCompany ACompany B
Debt0400
Interest at 5%020
Net income6045
Equity value800400
EV / EBITDA8.0x8.0x
EV / EBIT10.0x10.0x
P / E13.3x8.9x

Illustrative round numbers. Net income is EBIT less interest, taxed at 25%. Equity value is enterprise value less debt.

The EV multiples match, as identical businesses should, and the P/E gap comes from financing alone. Bankers call EV/EBITDA and EV/EBIT capital-structure neutral for this reason, and they anchor comparable company analysis on them. EV/EBITDA also ignores differences in depreciation policy between peers.

Interviewers ask about EV/net income to see whether you catch that mismatch. Valuation Multiples Explained covers the rest of the toolkit.

When EBITDA flatters a company

Capital-intensive businesses. Depreciation is how the income statement spreads past capital spending over the life of the assets. Add it back and you value a railway or a steel mill as if its assets never wear out. Two companies with the same EBITDA are worth different amounts if one must reinvest most of it each year to stand still. EV/EBIT, or EBITDA minus capex, puts that cost back.

Leases. IFRS 16, effective from 1 January 2019, brings leases onto the balance sheet and replaces the rent line with depreciation of the leased asset plus interest on the lease liability. Both sit below EBITDA, so EBITDA rises for any company with material leases. The IASB's own IFRS 16 effects analysis predicted that outcome, noting that EBITDA under IFRS 16 corresponds to EBITDAR (EBITDA before rent) under the old standard. Under the US GAAP model, the same document notes, operating lease cost stays a single straight-line expense within operating costs, so it still reduces EBITDA. A UK retailer and a US retailer with identical store estates can report different EBITDA for the same economics.

The fix is consistency. If lease costs sit inside your EBITDA, leave lease liabilities out of enterprise value. If the accounting has stripped them out, add lease liabilities in.

The follow-ups that test it

"Which is better, EBIT or EBITDA?" It depends on capital intensity. EBITDA is the default for comps because it strips out differences in depreciation policy. EBIT gives the fairer picture when capital spending is a recurring cost of staying in business.

"Depreciation rises by 10. What happens to all three?" EBITDA does not change. EBIT falls by 10. Net income falls by 10 times one minus the tax rate: 7.5 at an illustrative 25% rate, because the extra depreciation saves 2.5 of tax.

"Is EBITDA the same as cash flow?" No. It ignores capex, changes in working capital, cash taxes and interest. Treat it as a rough gauge of operating cash flow before reinvestment.

"When would you use P/E instead?" For banks. Deposits and debt are their raw material and interest is an operating cost, so enterprise value and EBITDA lose their meaning and equity-based multiples take over.

"A company's EBITDA jumped after it adopted IFRS 16. Is it worth more?" No. The cash it pays for rent has not changed; the accounting moved that cost below the EBITDA line. Add lease liabilities to enterprise value and the comparison is fair again.

How to make it stick this week

  1. Rebuild the three numbers from one annual report. Take operating income, add back D&A from the cash flow statement, then walk down to net income. Compare your EBITDA with the company's adjusted figure and list every add-back.
  2. Run the "+10" drill on other lines. Say aloud what happens to all three measures if interest expense, SG&A or the tax rate changes.
  3. Explain the Company A and Company B example from memory. If you can show why P/E moved while EV/EBITDA stayed put, you own the capital-structure point.

This question sits next to the DCF in most technical rounds, and it rewards a structured answer over a long one, as Knowing the Answer Is Not the Same as Passing explains. More free material is in the Knowledge Base, and new pieces land in IBB Insights.

Reading about it is step one.

Practice is step two — members drill these questions in the Superday Dojo, graded on whether they understood the concept. The Knowledge Base has more to read in the meantime.

← All Insights